Posts

Posted on

THIS IS MY MAYOR! đź—˝ Zorhan Momdani, now the Mayor of NYC, is a leader who was on the front lines fighting for us long before he took office. This exclusive video captures Zorhan several months ago, in the hallways of Congress, confronting Tom Holman about the illegal deportation and caging of families of color. You can see the raw passion as he and other protesters scream for accountability, with state police trying to hold them back. He was and still is standing up for everyday New Yorkers and the most vulnerable in our communities in Queens and beyond.This is the energy we need leading our city! A fighter for the people, not the powerful.

What do YOU remember about this moment? Drop a ✊ in the comments if you stand with a leader who fights!

ZoranMomDonnie #NYCMayor #Activism #NewYorkCity

De Manifestante a Alcalde. Este es mi Alcalde, Zoran Mom Donnie, exigiendo justicia.

¡ESTE ES MI ALCALDE! 🗽 Zorhan Momdoni ahora el Alcalde de NYC, es un líder que estuvo en la primera línea luchando por nosotros mucho antes de asumir el cargo.
Este video exclusivo captura a Zorhan hace varios meses, en los pasillos del Congreso, confrontando a Tom Holman sobre la deportaciĂłn ilegal y el encarcelamiento de familias de color. Se puede ver la pura pasiĂłn con la que Ă©l y otros manifestantes gritan pidiendo rendiciĂłn de cuentas, mientras la policĂ­a estatal intenta detenerlos.
Él se puso y sigue poniéndose de pie por los neoyorquinos comunes y las personas más vulnerables en nuestras comunidades en Queens y más allá.
¡Esta es la energía que necesitamos para liderar nuestra ciudad! Un luchador por el pueblo, no por los poderosos.
¿Qué recuerdas TÚ de este momento? ¡Deja un ✊ en los comentarios si apoyas a un líder que lucha!

#Zorhan Momdani #AlcaldeNYC #Activis

Posted on

✨ The Power of Purpose: Speak, Work, and Live with Intent

We often navigate the world on autopilot, but true fulfillment comes from intentionality. Whether in the words we choose to share or the work we dedicate our lives to, the greatest difference we can make lies in the meaning we direct into every moment.

Here are seven guiding principles—plus one powerful truth—to remind us why contemplation and purpose must always come first.

On Speaking with Intention

🗣️ The quality of our words defines our character.

“Speak clearly, if you speak at all; carve every word before you let it fall.” — Oliver Wendell Holmes Sr.

On Finding Meaning in Work

🛠️ The hard work that matters most is the work you love.

“Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing.”

— Theodore Roosevelt

“The only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven’t found it yet, keep looking. Don’t settle.” — Steve Jobs

“The only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven’t found it yet, keep looking. Don’t settle.” — Steve Jobs

“Working hard for something we don’t care about is called stress: Working hard for something we love is called passion.” — Simon Sinek

On Living a Purposeful Life

🧭 Meaning comes from impact, not just happiness.

“The purpose of life is not to be happy. It is to be useful, to be honorable, to be compassionate, to have it make some difference that you have lived and lived well.” — Ralph Waldo Emerson

“Work gives you meaning and purpose, and life is empty without it.” — Stephen Hawking

On Action vs. Rhetoric

🧠 Your actions are the loudest voice you possess.

“What you do speaks so loudly that I cannot hear what you say.” — Ralph Waldo Emerson

A Final, Essential Truth

“Contemplate before you utter, ensuring every word serves a clear and meaningful purpose.”

— Jay

Posted on

⚖️ The Public Record and Demand for Transparency By—Jay

The public demand for full transparency regarding the Jeffrey Epstein files is indeed significant, driven by the scope of his alleged crimes and the revelation that many high-profile individuals, including politicians, business leaders, and celebrities, had ties to him. A major development concerning the public release of documents centered on a defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Ghislaine Maxwell. While Epstein’s criminal case was primarily federal, the related civil litigation stemming from the Maxwell case became the main vehicle for document disclosure. On December 19, 2023, a federal judge, Loretta Preska, ordered the unsealing of over 180 previously redacted names from these civil court records, which were released in batches starting in January 2024. This unsealing order, stemming from the case Giuffre v. Maxwell (Case 1:15-cv-07433), provided the official public documentation of various names associated with Epstein, confirming the identities of individuals mentioned in depositions and court filings, and intensifying the public’s call for the release of all remaining governmental and investigative files.

🏛️ Political Connections and The “Informant” Claim

The mention of President Donald Trump in the files relates to publicly available flight logs and civil court documents, and it has been a point of continuous public scrutiny. Records confirm that Trump flew on Epstein’s private jet, nicknamed the “Lolita Express,” on several occasions in the 1990s and early 2000s, before a known falling out. Furthermore, reports surfaced following Epstein’s 2019 death regarding a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) that the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) had entered into with Epstein in 2007. This agreement, which shielded his alleged co-conspirators from federal charges, later became the subject of intense controversy and a successful lawsuit, Giuffre v. U.S. Department of Justice, which was won by Giuffre, arguing the victims’ rights were violated. The claim that Epstein was an “informant” has been circulating in reports, suggesting that the leniency in the 2007 NPA was, in part, due to him allegedly providing information to authorities on others. However, this claim remains a contentious, unconfirmed element of the public narrative, viewed by critics as a mechanism used to justify the controversial handling of his case by federal authorities at the time.


⚖️ El Registro Público y la Demanda de Transparencia
La demanda pĂşblica por una transparencia total con respecto a los archivos de Jeffrey Epstein es ciertamente significativa, impulsada por la magnitud de sus presuntos crĂ­menes y la revelaciĂłn de que muchas figuras de alto perfil, incluidos polĂ­ticos, lĂ­deres empresariales y celebridades, tenĂ­an vĂ­nculos con Ă©l. Un desarrollo importante en relaciĂłn con la publicaciĂłn de documentos se centrĂł en una demanda por difamaciĂłn presentada por Virginia Giuffre contra Ghislaine Maxwell. Si bien el caso penal de Epstein fue principalmente federal, el litigio civil relacionado, derivado del caso Maxwell, se convirtiĂł en el principal vehĂ­culo para la divulgaciĂłn de documentos. El 19 de diciembre de 2023, una jueza federal, Loretta Preska, ordenĂł la publicaciĂłn de más de 180 nombres previamente censurados de estos registros judiciales civiles, que se revelaron en grupos a partir de enero de 2024. Esta orden de publicaciĂłn, derivada del caso Giuffre v. Maxwell (Caso 1:15-cv-07433), proporcionĂł la documentaciĂłn pĂşblica oficial de varios nombres asociados con Epstein, confirmando las identidades de individuos mencionados en declaraciones juradas y presentaciones judiciales, e intensificando el llamado del pĂşblico para la divulgaciĂłn de todos los archivos gubernamentales y de investigaciĂłn restantes.  
🏛️ Conexiones PolĂ­ticas y la AfirmaciĂłn de “Informante”
La menciĂłn del presidente Donald Trump en los archivos se relaciona con los registros de vuelo disponibles pĂşblicamente y documentos judiciales civiles, y ha sido un punto de continuo escrutinio pĂşblico. Los registros confirman que Trump volĂł en el jet privado de Epstein, apodado el “Lolita Express”, en varias ocasiones en la dĂ©cada de 1990 y principios de la de 2000, antes de un conocido distanciamiento. Además, tras la muerte de Epstein en 2019, surgieron informes sobre un acuerdo de no procesamiento (NPA) que la Oficina del Fiscal de los Estados Unidos en el Distrito Sur de Nueva York (SDNY) habĂ­a celebrado con Epstein en 2007. Este acuerdo, que protegiĂł a sus presuntos co-conspiradores de cargos federales, se convirtiĂł posteriormente en objeto de intensa controversia y de una demanda exitosa, Giuffre v. U.S. Department of Justice, que fue ganada por Giuffre, argumentando que los derechos de las vĂ­ctimas fueron violados. La afirmaciĂłn de que Epstein era un “informante” ha estado circulando en informes, sugiriendo que la indulgencia en el NPA de 2007 se debiĂł, en parte, a que supuestamente proporcionaba informaciĂłn a las autoridades sobre otras personas. Sin embargo, esta afirmaciĂłn sigue siendo un elemento polĂ©mico y no confirmado de la narrativa pĂşblica, visto por los crĂ­ticos como un mecanismo utilizado para justificar el polĂ©mico manejo de su caso por parte de las autoridades federales en ese momento.
Por—Jay

America The Beautiful

History, Health, expolitics, science, art, music, nature word events, news

Skip to content ↓